Browse Source

tools: a new tool for benchmarking storage backends

Current etcd repository has a test for benchmarking a storage backend
in storage/kvstore_bench_test.go. However, it is hard to test various
parameters (e.g. batch interval, a number of keys, etc) with the test.

This commit adds a new benchmarking subcommand "storage" to
tools/benchmark. It will encourage analysis of storage backends with
various parameter and complex workloads.

Exmaple usage:
$ ./benchmark storage put
total: 9.894173792s
average: 9.894173ms
minimum latency: 6.596991ms
maximum latency: 29.455695ms
Hitoshi Mitake 10 years ago
parent
commit
454865bd67
2 changed files with 168 additions and 0 deletions
  1. 112 0
      tools/benchmark/cmd/storage-put.go
  2. 56 0
      tools/benchmark/cmd/storage.go

+ 112 - 0
tools/benchmark/cmd/storage-put.go

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+// Copyright 2015 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+
+package cmd
+
+import (
+	"crypto/rand"
+	"fmt"
+	"os"
+	"time"
+
+	"github.com/coreos/etcd/Godeps/_workspace/src/github.com/spf13/cobra"
+)
+
+// storagePutCmd represents a storage put performance benchmarking tool
+var storagePutCmd = &cobra.Command{
+	Use:   "put",
+	Short: "Benchmark put performance of storage",
+
+	Run: storagePutFunc,
+}
+
+var (
+	totalNrKeys    int
+	storageKeySize int
+	valueSize      int
+	txn            bool
+)
+
+func init() {
+	storageCmd.AddCommand(storagePutCmd)
+
+	storagePutCmd.Flags().IntVar(&totalNrKeys, "total", 100, "a total number of keys to put")
+	storagePutCmd.Flags().IntVar(&storageKeySize, "key-size", 64, "a size of key (Byte)")
+	storagePutCmd.Flags().IntVar(&valueSize, "value-size", 64, "a size of value (Byte)")
+	storagePutCmd.Flags().BoolVar(&txn, "txn", false, "put a key in transaction or not")
+}
+
+func createBytesSlice(bytesN, sliceN int) [][]byte {
+	rs := make([][]byte, sliceN)
+	for i := range rs {
+		rs[i] = make([]byte, bytesN)
+		if _, err := rand.Read(rs[i]); err != nil {
+			panic(err)
+		}
+	}
+	return rs
+}
+
+func storagePutFunc(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
+	keys := createBytesSlice(storageKeySize, totalNrKeys)
+	vals := createBytesSlice(valueSize, totalNrKeys)
+
+	latencies := make([]time.Duration, totalNrKeys)
+
+	minLat := time.Duration(1<<63 - 1)
+	maxLat := time.Duration(0)
+
+	for i := 0; i < totalNrKeys; i++ {
+		begin := time.Now()
+
+		if txn {
+			id := s.TxnBegin()
+			if _, err := s.TxnPut(id, keys[i], vals[i]); err != nil {
+				fmt.Errorf("txn put error: %v", err)
+				os.Exit(1)
+			}
+			s.TxnEnd(id)
+		} else {
+			s.Put(keys[i], vals[i])
+		}
+
+		end := time.Now()
+
+		lat := end.Sub(begin)
+		latencies[i] = lat
+		if maxLat < lat {
+			maxLat = lat
+		}
+		if lat < minLat {
+			minLat = lat
+		}
+	}
+
+	total := time.Duration(0)
+
+	for _, lat := range latencies {
+		total += lat
+	}
+
+	fmt.Printf("total: %v\n", total)
+	fmt.Printf("average: %v\n", total/time.Duration(totalNrKeys))
+	fmt.Printf("rate: %4.4f\n", float64(totalNrKeys)/total.Seconds())
+	fmt.Printf("minimum latency: %v\n", minLat)
+	fmt.Printf("maximum latency: %v\n", maxLat)
+
+	// TODO: Currently this benchmark doesn't use the common histogram infrastructure.
+	// This is because an accuracy of the infrastructure isn't suitable for measuring
+	// performance of kv storage:
+	// https://github.com/coreos/etcd/pull/4070#issuecomment-167954149
+}

+ 56 - 0
tools/benchmark/cmd/storage.go

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// Copyright 2015 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+
+package cmd
+
+import (
+	"os"
+	"time"
+
+	"github.com/coreos/etcd/Godeps/_workspace/src/github.com/spf13/cobra"
+	"github.com/coreos/etcd/storage"
+)
+
+var (
+	batchInterval int
+	batchLimit    int
+
+	s storage.KV
+)
+
+func initStorage() {
+	s = storage.NewStore("storage-bench", time.Duration(batchInterval), batchLimit)
+	os.Remove("storage-bench") // boltDB has an opened fd, so removing the file is ok
+}
+
+// storageCmd represents the storage benchmarking tools
+var storageCmd = &cobra.Command{
+	Use:   "storage",
+	Short: "Benchmark storage",
+	Long: `storage subcommand is a set of various benchmark tools for storage subsystem of etcd.
+Actual benchmarks are implemented as its subcommands.`,
+
+	PersistentPreRun: storagePreRun,
+}
+
+func init() {
+	RootCmd.AddCommand(storageCmd)
+
+	storageCmd.PersistentFlags().IntVar(&batchInterval, "batch-interval", 100, "Interval of batching (milliseconds)")
+	storageCmd.PersistentFlags().IntVar(&batchLimit, "batch-limit", 10000, "A limit of batched transaction")
+}
+
+func storagePreRun(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
+	initStorage()
+}